Cancelling your registration will remove your access to the event. If you proceed, you will no longer be able to participate or access event-related materials.
Deleting your account will remove your access to the event.

Mr. Benck is a dual US/Luxembourg citizen who graduated from Birmingham-Southern College (BA- Economics, 1990). He obtained his Juris Doctorate from the University of Alabama School of Law (JD, 1993).
Professionally, he serves as the Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary for Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc. (Nasdaq: HIBB), a billion dollar, full line sporting goods distributor headquartered in Alabama with over 1,050 retail locations in approximately 36 US states, and nearly 10,000 employees.
Reporting directly to the CEO and the Board of Directors, he oversees the Legal Department and its staff of attorneys, Governmental Affairs, Economic and Competitive Intelligence, Enterprise Risk Management, Enterprise-wide Compliance, and serves as the Chief Privacy Officer (CIPP/US certified).
In addition to his role as chief legal officer for Hibbett, Mr. Benck serves in the following capacities:

Mr. Blood is a co-founding partner and the managing partner of Blood Hurst & O’Reardon LLP. For nearly thirty years, his practice has focused on complex litigation, including class actions. He has tried class action cases and is widely regarded for his expertise in consumer protection law, including California’s Unfair Competition Law and the Consumers Legal Remedies Act.
Prior to founding Blood Hurst & O’Reardon, Mr. Blood was a partner at Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, LLP and a founding partner of the firm now known as Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP.
Over the course of his career, Mr. Blood has represented millions of purchasers of food, dietary supplements, and over-the-counter drugs in litigation involving deceptive advertising claims by manufacturers and retailers. He has also represented owners of motor vehicles in product liability cases, as well as consumer credit and mortgage borrowers in cases against major lending institutions including Bank of America, Washington Mutual, Countrywide, GMAC, and Wells Fargo.
Mr. Blood has extensive experience litigating against life, auto, and other insurance companies on behalf of consumers. His work includes representing owners, holders, and beneficiaries of industrial life insurance in race discrimination cases with class periods dating back to the late 1800s. He also represented policyholders in “vanishing premium” market conduct actions and was responsible for one of only two litigated cases in which a class was certified in the vanishing premium litigation series. Additionally, he was one of the few plaintiffs’ attorneys to secure class-wide recoveries in the “imitation parts” automobile insurance actions.
Beyond insurance-related matters, Mr. Blood has represented consumers in false advertising actions, negative-option sales practice litigation, and cases involving defective computer equipment and software.
Mr. Blood has testified before both the California State Assembly and State Senate Judiciary Committees, as well as the Assembly and Senate Committees on Banking, Finance & Insurance. He has worked extensively with lawmakers and government agencies at the state and federal levels to shape consumer protection legislation, including lobbying related to the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 and opposing a California ballot initiative aimed at weakening class action rights.
He practices in state and federal courts nationwide and has represented consumer interests before the Federal Trade Commission, the California Department of Justice, the California Legislative Analyst’s Office, and the California Department of Insurance.
His work with the Federal Trade Commission has resulted in record-setting recoveries for consumers. In In re Skechers Toning Shoes Products Liability Litigation (W.D. Ky.), his collaboration with the FTC helped secure the largest consumer recovery in FTC history for a false advertising action.
George Washington University, J.D. (1990)
Hobart College, B.A. in Economics, with honors (1987)

David Fuad is an accomplished trial lawyer and litigation advisor who serves as the firm’s Los Angeles Office Leader. David represents technology and other innovative companies on the cutting edge of litigation and trial trends around the country, including serving as court-appointed liaison counsel for a major video game platform in dozens of cases alleging mental health product liability claims. Through litigating and trying cases in federal and state courts around the country, David has a full perspective on Orrick’s dispute resolution platform and extensive insight into niche juror, jurisdictional, and case management strategies.
Market leaders rely on David to handle their business-critical disputes. Setting him apart, David excels at breaking down highly technical details for juries at trial, innovates in strategic, big-picture thinking as part of national counsel representations, and thrives under pressure, nimbly adapting to changing landscapes as contentious matters and client business goals evolve.
In trial, litigation, arbitration or mediation, David delivers efficient and favorable results aligned with clients’ business objectives. Whether managing a nationwide docket of litigation for a global luxury retailer, to prevailing in health and safety mass tort litigation for the NCAA, to winning dismissal of or favorably resolving data privacy and consumer protection class actions, to high-stakes, precedent-setting employment victories for Oracle, David handles a range of commercial disputes. David was named a “Litigator of the Week” by American Lawyer for achieving a complete defense verdict in a precedent-setting jury trial, and has been named a “Litigator of the Week” Runner-Up twice for securing defense verdicts, including in a $100 million negligence action. In addition to these recognitions from American Lawyer, David was also named to The Recorder's list of Lawyers on the Fast Track in California.
Not all disputes end up in court. David leverages his extensive courtroom and alternative dispute resolution knowledge to provide invaluable risk mitigation counseling to both established and emerging companies. David serves as a business partner and trusted advisor to ambitious start-ups and high-growth companies, helping these clients see around corners to avoid or reduce potential exposures.
In addition to his legal practice, David is committed to challenging inequities through his pro bono work. David has overseen successful immigration asylum applications, and for Equal Justice Under Law he helped secure a favorable judgment in a federal civil rights class action, barring indigent criminal defendants unable to pay court-imposed fines and fees from being jailed in a system that was described as a “modern-day debtors’ prison.”
While attending law school, David served as an extern for two Los Angeles Superior Court judges and was a member of the Loyola Entertainment Law Review.

Born in Chicago, IL, Mr. Freese is a graduate of Auburn University (B.A. 1982). Mr. Freese graduated from Cumberland School of Law (J.D. 1985), where he served as the Articles Editor of the Cumberland Law Review (1984-1985). Mr. Freese is licensed to practice in Alabama (1985) and Mississippi (2000). He is admitted to the following courts: Alabama Supreme Court; Mississippi Supreme Court; United States Courts of Appeals for the Fifth, Seventh, Ninth and Eleventh Circuits; United States District Courts for the Northern, Middle and Southern Districts of Alabama and the Northern and Southern Districts of Mississippi.
Mr. Freese has 34 years of courtroom experience as a trial lawyer. Mr. Freese represents clients in several cases each year that result in multi-million-dollar jury verdicts and settlements. His practice takes him throughout the United States. Mr. Freese regularly practices in multiple state and federal courts. Mr. Freese has always focused his practice on catastrophic injury, wrongful death, and mass tort litigation. Mr. Freese has for two decades handled complex medical device and pharmaceutical litigation.
He currently focuses on product liability, mass torts, pharmaceutical litigation, environmental litigation, consumer and commercial fraud, and class actions. In the past, Mr. Freese has obtained many multi-million-dollar verdicts and settlements in medical, commercial, environmental, and personal injury cases.

Amir is the National Co-Chair of Shook’s Class Action Practice Group and co-leads Shook’s Automotive Industry Group. Amir's practice is primarily dedicated to defending companies in class actions and aggregated litigation.
Amir has led the defense of class actions of all types, including automotive, food, beverage, pet food, cosmetics, personal care products, and insurance. He has also defended companies in regional and specialty class action roles.
Beyond traditional class actions, Amir has served in lead roles in mass and aggregated litigation, including JCCP and MDL proceedings, and in managing class opt-out litigation and mass arbitrations.

Gary Lynch prosecutes class and complex litigation on behalf of plaintiffs and has extensive experience in data breach and privacy litigation, consumer protection, and employment law. Courts have consistently appointed him to leadership positions in high-profile class actions and coordinated proceedings, including most recently as Co-Lead Counsel representing consumers nationwide in In re: Zillow Group, Inc. Session Replay Software Litigation.
Gary has previously been appointed as Co-Lead Counsel representing plaintiffs in numerous large consolidated and MDL class actions, including In re Equifax, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation; First Choice Federal Credit Union v. The Wendy’s Company; In re: The Home Depot, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation; In re: Wawa, Inc. Data Security Litigation; and In re: FedLoan Student Loan Servicing Litigation. He has also served as a member of the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee representing consumer plaintiffs in In re Marriott International Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, among other cases.
In 2018, Gary successfully argued before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Dittman et al. v. UPMC, resulting in a landmark decision recognizing that companies owe a general duty of care to protect against data breaches and clarifying the application of the economic loss doctrine in the data breach context and beyond. In 2012, Gary served as Counsel of Record before the United States Supreme Court in Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk, addressing whether Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure can be used to moot a Fair Labor Standards Act collective action.
In addition to his work before the United States Supreme Court and Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Gary has successfully argued numerous federal appeals involving issues of first impression. These include Popa v. Harriet Carter Gifts, Inc., which recognized a cause of action under Pennsylvania’s wiretap law for third-party recording of website visitor browsing activity, and Hickey v. University of Pittsburgh, which recognized implied contract claims by students following COVID-19 campus shutdowns.
Gary also has significant trial experience in class actions. In 2018, he served as co-lead trial counsel in Verma v. 3001 Castor Inc. in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, securing a $4.59 million jury verdict on behalf of a class of misclassified workers under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act.
In 2019, Gary was selected as a finalist for The Legal Intelligencer’s Attorney of the Year award. In 2020, his firm was selected as Litigation Department of the Year by The Legal Intelligencer. In 2021, the firm was named a finalist for Litigation Department of the Year in the Pennsylvania region by The American Lawyer. In 2022, the firm was named a finalist for Privacy and Data Breach Firm of the Year by ALM, and in 2023 was named a Pennsylvania Powerhouse by Law360.
Gary, along with two of his partners, is a co-author of the current edition of Class Actions: The Law of 50 States, published by Law Journal Press.
With more than thirty-four years of experience, Gary has earned a reputation among peers and the judiciary for professionalism, efficiency, and collaboration in complex class action litigation. During a 2019 fairness hearing in First Choice Federal Credit Union v. The Wendy’s Company, the court commended class counsel for the organization, quality of briefing, and professionalism demonstrated throughout the litigation.

Matt Francis is the CEO and co-founder of Pattern Data, an innovative provider of AI-powered software solutions for the legal industry. Pattern Data's technology supports law firms and third-party administrators in navigating complex litigation, specializing in case development, claims evaluation, settlement analytics, and data management with a particular focus on mass tort cases. Pattern Data's software has been successfully deployed in high-profile litigations, such as the 3M Combat Arms Earplug Litigation and the Philips CPAP Litigation.
Prior to founding Pattern Data, Matt served as Vice President of Product, Class Action & Mass Torts at Epiq, following his role as Vice President of Healthcare Resolutions at The Garretson Group.

Judge Herndon currently serves as Special Master in the 3M CAE MDL 2885, Special Master in the Depo Provera MDL 3140, Fee Arbiter in the Opiate MDL 2804 and Trustee of the DII LLC Personal Injury Asbestos Trust. He gained considerable experience during his twenty plus years as a federal judge in mass tort litigation presiding over MDL cases and mass actions. He served in the Southern District of Illinois, Chief Judge from 2007 through 2014. He also served as Chair of the Judicial Conference Committee for Judicial Security by appointment of Chief Justice John Roberts. Prior to his federal tenure he served as a judge in Madison County, Illinois, where he was also a personal injury trial lawyer for fourteen years. He was inducted into the National Trial Lawyers Hall of Fame in 2017. He has served on the faculty for conferences and continuing legal education programs more than sixty-five times.

Rosemary Rivas has dedicated her legal career to representing consumers in complex class action litigation, covering claims from false advertising and defective products to privacy violations. She is deeply committed to securing justice for consumers, achieving billions of dollars in recoveries for her clients and the classes they represent.
Rosemary serves in leadership roles in various high-profile class action cases and multi-district litigations. In a competitive appointment process, Judge Charles R. Breyer appointed her to the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in the Volkswagen Clean Diesel Litigation, which culminated in a landmark $14 billion settlement. The Recorder recognized the lawyers selected by Judge Breyer as a class action “dream team.” For her contributions to the Volkswagen case, Rosemary was honored with the 2018 California Lawyer Attorney of the Year (CLAY) Award.
Throughout her career, Rosemary has received numerous accolades, including the Bay Area Legal Aid Guardian of Justice Award for her work in directing cy pres settlement funds to promote equal access to justice. She has been recognized as a Northern California Super Lawyer since 2019 and was previously named a Rising Star by Super Lawyers Magazine. Currently, she serves as a Lawyer Representative for the Northern District of California and the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference.
A fluent Spanish-speaker, Rosemary has been actively involved in diversity initiatives, previously serving on the Board and as Diversity Director of the Barristers Club of the San Francisco Bar Association. She frequently speaks at conferences on developments in consumer protection and class action litigation.

Loren Brown has an extensive litigation practice with a concentration in multi-district litigation. It often involves large-scale mass tort and class action matters, as well as parallel regulatory and government enforcement proceedings.
Loren's business litigation practice includes commercial tort and contract, trade secret, intellectual property, and securities class action matters. He has significant experience in a range of internal investigation, compliance, and regulatory matters as well, particularly in the life sciences sector.
Loren speaks and writes frequently on the subjects of multi-district litigation, expert evidence, mass tort and product liability litigation, risk mitigation and prevention, pharmaceutical and medical device litigation, and civil trial practice. He has served as national coordinating counsel, tried jury cases, argued appeals and successfully resolved many notable multi-district litigation matters throughout the US.
At DLA Piper, Loren serves as US Vice-Chairman, Chair of the Disputes practice, and is a member of the Global Board and US Executive Committee.

Brad Brian is a national trial lawyer and Chair of Munger, Tolles & Olson.
A complex civil and criminal litigator, Mr. Brian is a Fellow in the American College of Trial Lawyers and the International Academy of Trial Lawyers. He was recently named to the Los Angeles Business Journal’s 2025 LA500 List of the most influential people in Los Angeles. He is recognized by both Chambers USA and Chambers Global as one of the top trial lawyers in the country, having been ranked in Band 1 in both categories. Chambers USA calls him “heavyweight litigator for the full range of commercial and criminal trials” and highlights client feedback that he is “among the best to handle big-ticket litigation.”
Mr. Brian has served as lead trial and litigation counsel in some of the largest crisis cases in the country over the past 10 years, including: (a) Hawaiian Electric in the Maui wildfire litigation; (b) PG&E in its civil and criminal litigation arising from Northern California wildfires; (c) MGM Resorts in the litigation arising from the 2017 terrorist shooting at the Mandalay Bay Hotel; and (d) the offshore drilling giant Transocean in the criminal and civil litigation arising out of the Deepwater Horizon tragedy. Mr. Brian won significant trial victories for Transocean, PG&E in the criminal case arising from the Zogg fire, Jeffrey Gundlach and DoubleLine Capital in a trial against Trust Company of the West, and Rhonda Byrne (the author of The Secret).
Mr. Brian was recognized in The Best Lawyers in America 2025 edition for Bet-the-Company Litigation; Commercial Litigation; Corporate Compliance Law; Corporate Governance Law; and Criminal Defense: White-Collar, and in 2013 he was named its “Lawyer of the Year” for Bet-the-Company Litigation.

Chris Chorba is co-chair of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher’s Class Actions Practice Group. He specializes in defending class actions and complex litigation, and he has been recognized in Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business and in The Best Lawyers in America for Commercial Litigation. Law360 also named Mr. Chorba a “Class Action MVP,” which profiles attorneys who have “distinguished themselves from their peers by securing hard-earned successes in high-stakes litigation, complex global matters and record-breaking deals.” The National Law Journal also recognized him as a “Trailblazer” for his work defending consumer class actions.
Mr. Chorba has had substantial experience litigating a broad range of complex commercial matters at the trial and appellate level in California and throughout the country, and in multi-district litigation (MDLs). His litigation and counseling experience includes work for companies in every industry, including automotive, beauty / cosmetic, consumer products, education, entertainment, financial services, food and beverage, health care, insurance, life sciences, retail, social media, sports and gaming, technology, telecommunications, and utility / energy.

Hon. Vivian L. Medinilla (Ret.) FCIArb, a former Judge of the Delaware Superior Court, now focuses on alternative dispute resolution and litigation at Weiss, Saville, Medinilla & Houser, PA. Appointed in 2013 as the Court’s first Latina judge, she brings over 30 years of legal experience in both private practice and the judiciary. She presided over hundreds of jury and non-jury trials involving mass torts, asbestos, product liability, medical negligence, and complex commercial disputes. Bilingual in English and Spanish, she holds ADR certifications from Pepperdine Caruso School of Law, the National Judicial College, and Duke Law’s Bolch Judicial Institute focused on Mas Tort litigation. She is a member of AAA/ICDR, and a Fellow of both the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb), and the Academy of Court-Appointed Neutrals (ACAN). Her career also includes senior executive leadership in Delaware’s child welfare system, founding a multilingual civil litigation firm, and serving in national roles with ABA and NAWJ.

Norman E. Siegel litigates high-stakes cases for companies and individuals. He has earned a reputation locally and nationally for his ability to strategize, negotiate and deliver results. He was recently named by Best Lawyers as a 2020 “Lawyer of the Year” and by Law360 as a “Titan of the Plaintiff’s Bar” for his work in class action litigation following big wins against some of the largest corporations in America.
Norm has successfully tried to verdict a wide range of cases, obtaining several multimillion-dollar jury verdicts, and has obtained billions in settlements for his clients.
Norm concentrates his practice in three principal areas:
Business Litigation. Norm successfully deploys the firm’s contingency fee business litigation model in bet-the-company and “David vs. Goliath” matters involving intellectual property, breach of contract, fraud, misrepresentation and more. In one such matter, he prosecuted a groundbreaking antitrust case on behalf of Heartland Surgical Specialty Hospital, which claimed the region’s dominant hospital systems conspired to prevent it from obtaining in-network provider contracts. After Norm secured a key admission from a defense witness, Heartland settled with all defendants.
Data Breach and Privacy. Named one of Law360's “MVPs of the Year” for Cybersecurity and Privacy, Norm has served as lead counsel in several of the largest data breach cases litigated to date, including the sprawling multidistrict litigation alleging Equifax compromised the personal information of more than 148 million Americans in a 2017 data breach. More than 250 cases were filed against Equifax, and Norm was selected lead counsel over scores of other applicants. A leader in this burgeoning field of law, Norm has prosecuted data breach claims against Capital One, Quest Diagnostics, Target Corp., The Home Depot Inc., Marriott, the Office of Personnel Management, and the National Board of Examiners in Optometry, and he is the co-founder of the American Association for Justice’s data breach and privacy group.
Class Actions. Norm’s recent work includes multimillion-dollar jury verdicts and settlements on behalf of consumers who were overcharged for life insurance policies. In Vogt v. State Farm Insurance Co., Norm delivered the closing argument to the jury that returned a $34 million verdict for Missouri owners of State Farm life insurance. Norm also served as lead counsel in Larson v. John Hancock Life Insurance Co., a nationwide class action that ultimately settled for $59.75 million just before trial. For his work in the field, Best Lawyers recently named Norm “Lawyer of the Year” for class action litigation.
Norm began his career as an Assistant Attorney General at the Missouri Attorney General’s Office, where he gained a broad range of experience in complex litigation. He was later named partner at the firm now known as Dentons before starting Stueve Siegel Hanson in 2001.
Norm was recognized as a 2020 Missouri Lawyers Awards Influential Lawyer by Missouri Lawyers Weekly; has been named among the “500 Leading Plaintiffs’ Lawyers in America” by Lawdragon; and is listed among Best Lawyers in America and Kansas City Business Journal’s “Best of the Bar.” He has been honored several times as a Top 100 Missouri/Kansas “Super Lawyer” and a Benchmark Plaintiffs “Local Litigation Star.”
Norm has served on the boards of the Healthcare Foundation of Greater Kansas City, the Kansas City Bar Foundation and the Negro Leagues Baseball Museum. Outside the office, he enjoys tennis, collecting art, and spending time with his family and his dog, a Whoodle named Lucky.
.jpg)
Brian A. Glasser, founding partner of Bailey & Glasser, LLP, is a Rhodes scholar and Harvard Law graduate. He has over 31 years of experience, during which he has tried cases in 18 states, including two mass actions and six class actions. In 2025, he obtained as co-lead trial counsel for the Coalition of Counsel for Justice for Talc Claimants dismissal of another “Texas Two-Step” attempt by Johnson & Johnson to discharge liabilities arising from people alleging its baby powder causes cancer.
This year Brian was also lead trial counsel in a class action win against State Farm where a jury rendered a verdict in favor of approximately 37,000 Arkansas State Farm customers who suffered a “total loss” of their vehicle. The jury found that the insurance company breached the contract of insurance when its computer program applied a “typical negotiation adjustment” to comparable vehicles used to determine the “actual cash value” of the wrecked vehicle.
Learn more about the cases and matters mentioned below on the firm website: baileyglasser.com/lawyers-brian-a-glasser

Mikal C. Watts is a nationally recognized mass tort and trial lawyer and the founder of Watts Law Firm LLP. His work is guided by a simple principle - good lawyers using good laws to help good people. Every case he takes on is driven by results that matter, accountability that forces change, and justice for people whose lives have been devastated by corporate negligence and large-scale disasters.
Over the course of his career, Mikal has represented more than 200,000 clients and recovered billions of dollars in cases involving wildfires, toxic exposure, automobile manufacturers, catastrophic personal injury, and mass disasters. His work consistently targets industries that place profit over safety, using the law to drive systemic reform and protect future communities.
Mikal has represented more wildfire survivors than any lawyer in the nation and played a central role in negotiating the historic $13.5 billion settlement with Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) on behalf of families who lost homes, livelihoods, and loved ones. Today, Mikal is at the forefront of high-stakes litigation nationwide and abroad, representing Ukrainian civilians harmed by missiles and drones containing U.S. technology, fighting for communities poisoned by PFAS “forever chemicals,” and pursuing justice for families impacted by acetaminophen exposure linked to autism and ADHD. Each case reflects an unwavering focus on accountability, results, and lasting change.

Michael is a highly experienced trial lawyer who has represented clients in class action and complex litigation matters, including cases related to economic product defects, unfair competition, false and deceptive advertising, business torts, privacy, entertainment and intellectual property. He has defended consumer protection actions and investigation initiated by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the U.S. Department of Justice, the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the Federal Communications Commission, as well as numerous state enforcement agencies. A client states that Michael is “a very smart lawyer and a very good strategist; he’s really excellent.”
For more than 20 years, Michael has been at the forefront of representing clients in significant consumer protection matters, including:
He regularly counsels clients on marketing and advertising issues, and has substantial experience in the automotive, fashion retail, dietary supplement, telemarketing, electronic mail marketing, consumer products and payment processing industries.
He is the recipient of numerous accolades, including recognition by Chambers USA in the categories of California Litigation: General Commercial, and Product Liability: Consumer Class Action, and The Legal 500 United States in Dispute Resolution – Product Liability, mass torts and class actions: automotive/transport and consumer products. Law360 named him one of the “Transportation MVPs of the Year” in 2018, and a “Privacy & Consumer Protection MVP” in 2012. BTI Consulting Group recognized him as a “BTI Client Service All-Star” in 2012. Southern California Super Lawyers has honored him for Class Action/Mass Torts, Business Litigation and Civil Litigation Defense. Michael also has received the President’s Volunteer Service Award from the President’s Council on Service and Civic Participation.
Michael also has served as outside counsel to the State Bar of California on issues related to its member programs. Before joining Shook, he was a partner with Sidley Austin, where he was the co-leader of the firm’s Consumer Class Action Defense practice. He also is an avid marathoner, triathlete and four-time Ironman, completing competitions in Maryland (2018), Vineman (Sonoma County, California, 2016), Cozumel (2015) and Boulder (2014).

Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín began serving as a United States district judge for the Northern District of California in March 2023. Prior to her appointment to the federal bench, she was an impact litigator working for the National Immigration Law Center, from 2018 to 2023. Judge Martínez-Olguín served as the managing attorney at the Immigrants’ Rights Project at Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto from 2017 to 2018, and as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights from 2016 to 2017. She also worked at the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project and Women’s Rights Project from 2013 to 2015 and from 2006 to 2010, respectively. Judge Martínez-Olguín was a staff attorney for Legal Aid at Work (formerly Legal Aid Society – Employment Law Center) from 2010 to 2013.
Judge Martínez-Olguín received her A.B. from Princeton University’s School of Public and International Affairs in 1999 and her J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law in 2004. Following law school, she served as a law clerk to the Honorable David Briones of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas from 2004 to 2006. Judge Martínez-Olguín is a Mexican immigrant and taught Spanish for Lawyers as an adjunct professor at Berkeley Law School in 2012, 2013 and 2016. She is also an elected member of the American Law Institute.


Many consider Jason Itkin to be the nation’s top trial lawyer. He has won several of the largest jury verdicts in United States history, including an $8 billion record-breaking verdict against Johnson & Johnson, a record-setting $2.25 billion verdict against Monsanto, and a historic $860 million wrongful death verdict in Texas, a $175 million product liability verdict, a $117 million verdict in Louisiana, and a $100 million personal injury verdict.
Jason is the rare lawyer whose success in front of juries translates into success negotiating settlements against large corporations. Jason has been the architect of several settlements where the amounts paid to Arnold & Itkin’s clients each exceeded $1 billion. In the last 12 months alone, Jason has won more than $3.5 billion in verdicts and settlements for his clients. Jason Itkin is known nationwide for winning record-breaking verdicts and settlements. Jason is one of only a handful of lawyers in the country who have won more than one jury verdict for a single person in excess of one billion dollars. He has also won several verdicts and settlements for more than $100 million, dozens of verdicts and settlements of more than $10 million, and hundreds of verdicts and settlements for more than $1 million. Jason won these victories in courtrooms across the country—having represented clients in all 50 states.
Jason is routinely asked to work on the country’s highest-profile cases. He has won verdicts for children in jury trials against major pharmaceutical companies. He has also won game-changing victories for cancer victims against some of the world’s most powerful companies. After the BP Oil Spill, more of the workers injured in the explosion trusted Jason over any other lawyer to handle their cases.
Jason’s success in the courtroom has helped him negotiate massive settlements for his clients. Jason has been the lead negotiator on several settlements where the companies paid Arnold & Itkin’s clients more than $1 billion. Jason also works on important cases that don’t always grab headlines. For example, he achieved a $72 million voluntary settlement for an injured worker. At the time, that victory was the largest pretrial settlement for a single person in Texas history. Less than one year later, Jason broke his own record when he secured an $86 million voluntary settlement for a different client who suffered devastating injuries while working. Since then, Jason and the firm have broken the $86 million record multiple times. In just the last year, Jason has settled cases for single individuals in the amounts of $211 million, $209 million, $160 million, and $140 million. Jason has won more than $3.5 billion in verdicts and settlements for his clients over the last 12 months.
Jason is able to achieve these record-breaking settlements because sophisticated companies realize that their results at trial could be much worse. For example, Jason tried a case where an insurance company refused to make a fair settlement offer to his client. The company’s short-sighted settlement position changed after Jason finished cross-examining the company’s “star witness.” After the cross-examination, the company fired its long-time lawyer in the middle of the trial. The next day, the company settled the case for nearly double what Jason’s client would have settled for pretrial. The company also formally apologized to Jason’s client for injuring him.
Results like these are why other law firms frequently ask Jason to work on their cases. More than 200 different law firms have hired Jason as trial counsel. Lawyers across the nation know that having Jason Itkin on their team increases the likelihood of winning a large verdict or settlement.
.png)
Building upon his experience in complex asbestos cases, the historic tobacco lawsuits, and the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation, Don Migliori is a multifaceted litigator who can navigate both the courtroom and the negotiating table. He represents victims of defective medical devices and drugs, occupational diseases, terrorism, aviation disasters, antitrust, and securities and consumer fraud in mass torts and other cutting-edge litigation that spans the country.
Don serves in leadership roles for a number of multidistrict litigations, including being a key member of Motley Rice’s team that represents dozens of cities, towns, counties and townships in the National Prescription Opiate MDL against opioid manufacturers and distributors. He also represents states in similarly filed litigation. He played a significant role in negotiations on behalf of tens of thousands of women allegedly harmed by pelvic mesh/sling products and served as co-liaison counsel in the N.J. Bard pelvic mesh litigation in Atlantic County. Hundreds of cases have been filed in federal and state courts against multiple defendants.
He is also co-lead counsel for In re Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation, a member of the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee for In re Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, as well as the Depuy® Orthopaedics, Inc. ASR™ and Pinnacle® Hip Implant MDLs. Don has litigated against both Ethicon, a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, and C.R. Bard previously in pelvic mesh litigation and also against C.R. Bard in the Composix® Kugel® hernia mesh multidistrict litigation, In re Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Products Liability Litigation, the first MDL before the federal court of Rhode Island. Don also serves as co-lead plaintiffs’ counsel and liaison counsel in the federal MDL, and as liaison counsel for the Composix® Kugel® Mesh lawsuits consolidated in Rhode Island state court on behalf of thousands of individuals alleging injury by the hernia repair patch.
As liaison counsel for all wrongful death and personal injury cases in the September 11th aviation security litigation, Don played a central role in the extensive discovery, mediations and settlements of more than 50 cases of aviation liability and damages against numerous defendants. He also represented families of the victims who opted out of the Victim Compensation Fund to seek greater answers, accountability and recourse. Additionally, he manages associated litigation as a lead attorney for In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, MDL #1570, a groundbreaking case designed to bankrupt the financiers of al Qaeda.
Don contributed his experience in connection with the commencement of and strategy for shareholder derivative litigation brought on behalf Chiquita Brands International, Inc., alleging the defendants breached their fiduciary duties by paying bribes to terrorist organizations in violation of U.S. and Columbian law. He also served as trial counsel for PACE Industry Union-Management Pension Fund in a securities case against Forest Laboratories, Inc., and was involved in the initial liability discovery and trial strategy in an ongoing securities fraud class action involving Household International, Inc.
Don began working with Motley Rice attorneys in 1997 on behalf of the State Attorneys General in the historic lawsuit against Big Tobacco, resulting in the largest civil settlement in U.S. history. He tried several noteworthy asbestos cases on behalf of mesothelioma victims, including the state of Indiana’s first contractor liability verdict and first premises liability verdict for wrongful exposure to asbestos. He continues to manage asbestos cases and actively litigates mesothelioma lawsuits and individual tobacco cases in the courtroom.
Don is a frequent speaker at legal seminars across the country and has appeared on numerous television and radio programs, as well as in print media to address legal issues related to terrorist financing, aviation security, class action litigation, premises liability and defective medical devices. A "Distinguished Practitioner in Residence" at Roger Williams University School of Law for the 2010- 2011 academic year, Don taught mass torts as an adjunct professor for more than 10 years. Don is an AV® rated attorney by Martindale-Hubbell®.

John A. Yanchunis, Morgan & Morgan's class action lead, has spent almost two decades helping victims recover costs incurred in data breaches.
John A. Yanchunis leads the Class Action Department of the firm. Mr. Yanchunis’ practice— which began after completing a two-year clerkship with United States District Judge Carl O. Bue, Jr., Southern District of Texas—has concentrated on complex litigation and spans over 36 years, including class actions for almost two-thirds of that time.
Mr. Yanchunis has served as lead, co-lead, or class counsel in numerous class actions in a wide variety of areas affecting consumers, including but not limited to anti-trust, civil rights, defective products, environmental claims, life insurance, annuities, and unfair and deceptive practices. He has been appointed by courts to leadership positions in multidistrict class action litigation, and presently serves as the lead in In re: Yahoo! Inc. Customer Data Breach Security Litigation, 5:16-md-02752 (N.D. Cal.), as a member of the plaintiffs’ steering committee In re Equifax, Inc. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., 1:17-md-02800 (N.D. Ga.); on the three-member Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL No. 2664, In re: U.S. Office Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation, and serves on the Executive Committee overseeing the consumer class, the financial institution class, and the shareholder derivative litigation pending against Target Corporation—one of the largest data-breach cases to date—in In re Target Corporation Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL No. 2522 (D. Minn.).
As a result of his experience in insurance and complex litigation, beginning in 2005, Mr. Yanchunis served as lead counsel for the Florida Department of Financial Services and the Florida Department of Insurance Regulation (the insurance regulators of Florida) in their investigation of the insurance industry on issues concerning possible antitrust activity and other possible unlawful activities regarding the payment of undisclosed compensation to insurance brokers. Mr. Yanchunis served as lead regulator counsel and worked with a core group of state Attorneys General from the National Association of Attorneys General, which were selected to conduct the investigations. The insurance regulators for Florida was the only insurance regulators in the group. The litigation that was filed and the other investigations recovered millions of dollars in restitution for Florida consumers and resulted in significant changes in the way commercial insurance is sold in Florida and across the country.
During his career, Mr. Yanchunis has tried numerous cases in state and federal courts, including one of the largest and longest insurance coverage cases in U.S. history, which was filed in 1991 by The Celotex Corporation and its subsidiary, Carey Canada, Inc. During the seventeen years the case was pending, Mr. Yanchunis served as lead counsel for several insurance companies, regarding coverage for asbestos and environmental claims. The case was tried in three phases over several years beginning in 1992. Mr. Yanchunis was also lead counsel for these parties in the subsequent appeals which followed a judgment in favor of his clients.
Mr. Yanchunis served as an elected member of the Young Lawyers Board of Governors (two terms) and Board of Governors of The Florida Bar (the governing body of The Florida Bar) (two terms), served as a member of The Board of Directors of The Florida Bar Foundation, and was appointed by The Supreme Court of Florida to serve as a member The Florida Board of Bar Examiners. After the completion of his five-year term on the Board of Bar Examiners, Mr. Yanchunis has been reappointed annually by the Florida Supreme Court since 2002 to serve as an Emeritus Member on character and fitness panels and as an arbiter in final hearings.
Mr. Yanchunis has also served on many committees of The Florida Bar, including leadership positions. Most recently, he completed a term as the Chair of the Consumer Protection Committee of the Florida Bar. Mr. Yanchunis has also represented The Florida Bar in a number of matters. He was also appointed by the Florida Supreme Court to enforce an injunction of the Court, and his efforts resulted in the incarceration of the respondent in that case on the finding that the respondent had engaged in indirect criminal contempt. As a result of his experience in the area of class litigation and ethics, he has served as an expert for The Florida Bar on ethical issues arising in class action litigation.
He received the Elder Law Section of The Florida Bar awarded him its Chair’s Honor Award for Mr. Yanchunis’ handling with one of his law partners of a class action against the state of Florida for violations of federal law in failing to deliver a benefit under Medicaid to approximately 41,000 elderly residents of nursing homes in Florida. He is also the recipient of The Florida Bar Foundation President’s Award for Excellence for his outstanding leadership in promoting the Foundation’s mission to help provide legal assistance for the poor. Mr. Yanchunis frequently lectures around the United States on topics related to class actions.
In the community, Mr. Yanchunis served as a member of the Elder Law Board, College of Law and the Center for Excellence in Elder Law, Stetson University College of Law. He has been a member of the Boy Scouts of America since his youth having earned the rank of Eagle, and has served in virtually every leadership position as an adult leader in Cub Scouts and Boy Scouts, including as Council President to the West Central Florida Council of the Boy Scouts of America, and as a member of National Council of the Boy Scouts of America.
Mr. Yanchunis is a member of The Florida Bar (admitted in 1981). Additionally, he is admitted to the United States Supreme Court; the United States Courts of Appeal for the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits; the United States District Court for the Southern, Northern, and Western Districts of Texas; the United States District Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Wisconsin; the United States District Court for the Middle and Southern Districts of Florida; the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky; the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois; the United States District Court of Connecticut; and the United States District Court of Colorado.
Martindale-Hubbell has honored Mr. Yanchunis with the prestigious “AV” rating. He has been recognized continuously as a Florida Super Lawyer and The Best Lawyers in America in his area of practice. He is a Fellow in The Trial Lawyer Honorary Society of the Litigation Counsel of America, and a Fellow of The Florida Bar Foundation. While at the University of Florida Mr. Yanchunis was a member of Florida Blue Key and Omicron Delta Kappa. He received his Juris Doctor degree from the South Texas College of Law in 1980, where he graduated magna cum laude. During law school, Mr. Yanchunis was a member of the Order of the Lytae, Associate Editor-in-Chief and Technical Editor of the South Texas Law Journal.
.jpg)
A relentless and principled advocate, Kenneth S. Byrd is a partner in Lieff Cabraser’s Nashville office and an experienced trial attorney who has obtained several large jury verdicts against major tobacco companies. He received the Tennessee Association for Justice’s 2015 Paladin Award for his successful litigation against cigarette manufacturers R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA Inc., and Lorillard Tobacco Company in Florida federal courts. The Paladin Award is TAJ’s highest honor and is given to the state’s top trial lawyer of the year. His work in these cases included securing separate jury verdicts of $27 million and $41 million, both upheld on appeal.
Kenny represents clients in mass tort cases, defective product cases, and consumer fraud litigation. He represents consumers in class actions as well as injured individuals and families in personal injury and wrongful death cases nationwide. His leadership roles include appointments to the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee and Early Vetting Subcommittee in In re 3M Combat Arms Earplug Liability Litigation, MDL 2885 (the largest MDL in U.S. history), and to the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in In re AME Church Employee Retirement Fund Litigation, MDL 3035.
Kenny is also a member of Lieff Cabraser’s Whistleblower/False Claims Act practice group, helping whistleblowers expose fraud and the misuse of government funds.
Consumer protection and defective products.
Boston College Law School, J.D., cum laude (2004)
Samford University, B.S. in Mathematics, minor in Journalism (1995), cum laude
Tennessee (2004)
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (2009)
U.S. District Court, District of Colorado (2019)
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois (2016)
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan (2020)
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee (2006)
U.S. District Court, Middle District of Tennessee (2005)
U.S. District Court, Western District of Tennessee (2007)
Faculty, “Texas Two Step. When Insurance is Gone and the Bankruptcy Court Is Not: Mass Torts in Crisis,” Mississippi Association for Justice Winter CLE Seminar (2022)
Speaker, “Mass Torts/Class Actions and Bankruptcy Issues,” Trial Lawyers of Mass Torts Inaugural Conference (2022)
Co-author, ABA Survey of Federal Circuit Court’s Class Action Decisions (2018)
American Bar Association
American Constitution Society, Nashville Chapter
Camp Ridgecrest Alumni & Friends (Board Member)
Harry Phillips American Inn of Court, Nashville Chapter
Historic Edgefield, Inc. (President, 2009–2011)
Nashville Bar Association
Tennessee Bar Association
Tennessee Trial Lawyers Board of Directors
Tennessee Trial Lawyers Association (Board of Governors)
Best Lawyers in America (Consumer Protection, Personal Injury Litigation–Plaintiffs, Product Liability Litigation–Plaintiffs), 2018–2024
Lawyer of the Year, Product Liability Litigation (Nashville), 2023
Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers in America, 2021–2023
Outstanding Private Practice Antitrust Achievement, American Antitrust Institute, 2020
Media interview, “Full Measure Talks to Kenny Byrd About the ‘Forgotten’ Tobacco War,” 2019
Adjunct Faculty, Vanderbilt Law School, “The Practice of Aggregate Litigation,” 2018–present
Media coverage in Nashville Scene (2015, 2017)
Paladin Award, Tennessee Association for Justice, 2015
Super Lawyers Rising Star for Mid-South, 2014
.jpg)
Joe Petrosinelli is the Chairman of Williams & Connolly and a member of the firm’s Executive Committee. He is also Co-Chair of the firm’s Products Liability practice group. Joe has tried numerous civil and criminal cases in federal and state courts, has been lead counsel in several significant U.S. and international arbitrations, and has represented clients in litigation and investigations matters in Europe, Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean.
Joe’s civil practice focuses on products liability, mass tort/class action, and complex commercial litigation. He has represented manufacturers and suppliers of chemicals, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, industrial equipment, military hardware and technology, and various other products in litigation and arbitration matters across the United States and internationally. He also has represented various companies in large contract and other commercial disputes.
In his government investigations and criminal defense practice, Joe represents clients in a wide variety of matters, including federal grand jury proceedings, trial and appellate work in federal and state courts, and international or cross-border investigations. He has defended both individuals and corporations against allegations of mail and wire fraud, false claims, government contracts fraud, FCPA violations, public corruption, healthcare fraud, and securities violations. He and two of his partners successfully represented the petitioner before the U.S. Supreme Court in Cleveland v. United States, 531 U.S. 12 (2000), a leading case on the interpretation of the federal mail and wire fraud statutes.

Terry is the managing partner of Markovits, Stock & DeMarco, LLC, a boutique plaintiffs’ litigation firm in Cincinnati, Ohio. His practice focuses on complex commercial litigation, class action litigation, and sports and entertainment law. In 2022 alone, Terry was a member of court-appointed class counsel in finally- approved class action settlements valued at over $758 million and part of plaintiff’s counsel in an individual state settlement of $80 million. Terry has been recognized as a Super Lawyers Rising Stars and Super Lawyer each year since 2014, Best Lawyers since 2020, Cincinnati Business Courier’s Forty under 40 (2019), Wittenberg University’s Outstanding Young Alumnus (2014), Flying Pig Marathon’s Volunteer of the Year (2016), and is the current Executive Director of the Potter Stewart Inn of Court.

Rodolfo “Rudy” Armando Ruiz II has served as a District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida since 2019. Judge Ruiz is a member of the Judicial Conference of the United States Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, where he chairs the Subcommittee on Legislation. He also serves on the Local Rules Committee of the Judicial Council of the United States Eleventh Judicial Circuit. Judge Ruiz is Chair of the Probation Committee for the Southern District of Florida and former Chair of the Court’s Budget Committee. He currently presides over MDL-3090, In Re: Fortra File Transfer Software Data Security Breach Litigation, his second transferee assignment from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, having previously presided over MDL-2994, In Re: Mednax Services, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation.
Before his appointment to the federal bench, Judge Ruiz served as a Circuit Court Judge for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida from 2014 to 2019, and as a Miami-Dade County Court Judge from 2012 to 2014. During his service as a state court judge, he was Chair of the Florida Bar’s Civil Procedure Rules Committee and was appointed to the Florida Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases. Judge Ruiz was also an active member of the Florida judicial faculty and served as the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court Liaison to Dade Legal Aid.
Prior to becoming a judge, Judge Ruiz worked as an Assistant County Attorney with the Miami-Dade County Attorney’s Office from 2009 to 2012. In that role, he represented Miami-Dade County and its employees in federal and state courts at both the trial and appellate levels, serving in the Federal Litigation, Tax & Finance, and Torts Sections. Earlier, from 2006 to 2008, he was an associate with White & Case L.L.P., specializing in mergers and acquisitions, asset-backed financings, and general corporate matters as part of the firm’s Corporate Latin America practice group.
Judge Ruiz served as a law clerk to the Honorable Federico A. Moreno of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida from 2005 to 2006. He earned a Bachelor of Science in Economics from Duke University and a Juris Doctor from Georgetown University, where he was Articles Editor for the American Criminal Law Review.
Judge Ruiz currently serves as Board Vice Chair of the Kenan Institute for Ethics at Duke University. He is also a member of the Georgetown Law Alumni Board and the Judicial Group of Directors of the South Florida Chapter of the Federal Bar Association. In addition, he has served as an adjunct professor at St. Thomas University School of Law, teaching Complex Litigation.

A senior partner at Seeger Weiss, Dave represents individual and corporate plaintiffs in state and federal courts throughout the country. His practice focuses on litigating and trying complex commercial and product liability matters. Dave’s docket involves a wide variety of cases, including pharmaceutical injury, product liability claims, trade secrets, commercial disputes, pension challenges, securities and investment fraud, and consumer claims. Though the scope of his cases is broad, they are usually large, national, high-stakes cases, generally destined for trial. By their nature, they are often centered in federal multi-district proceedings or analogous state coordinated proceedings, where Dave is often selected by his co-counsel or appointed by the courts to lead them as liaison counsel, lead counsel, or a member of plaintiffs’ executive/steering committee.
Having majored in chemistry and biology in undergrad, Dave’s scientific background is a ready asset featured in the technical and pharmaceutical cases in which he often focuses. He is likewise known for his extensive experience in the discovery and preservation of electronic information, and has served as a consultant in this capacity for many other law firms. He is frequently invited to speak to an array of audiences and conferences—directed to practicing plaintiffs’ and defense attorneys, judges, students, and professional organizations—on issues concerning trial practice, discovery, and complex and products liability litigation.

Michael A. London is a founding partner of Douglas & London, P.C., based in New York City. He earned his Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Miami and his Juris Doctor degree from Brooklyn Law School. Mr. London is admitted to practice law in New York and New Jersey, as well as in the United States District Courts for the Eastern, Southern, and Western Districts of New York, and the District of New Jersey.
Since the beginning of his legal career, Mr. London has focused exclusively on representing consumers and injury victims, primarily in mass tort and products liability litigation involving pharmaceuticals and medical devices. He has been appointed to significant leadership positions in some of the largest national mass torts and complex litigations of the past two decades, often serving as lead counsel, co-lead counsel, or liaison counsel.
Vice-Chair, Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, In re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, MDL 1596 (E.D.N.Y.) – $700 million settlement of approximately 8,000 claims.
Co-Lead Counsel, In re Yasmin and Yaz (Drospirenone) Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, MDL 2100 (S.D. Ill.) – Over $2 billion settlement.
Co-Lead Counsel and Liaison Counsel, In re Bayer Corp. Combination Aspirin Products Marketing and Sales Practice Litigation, MDL 2023 (E.D.N.Y.) – $15 million class settlement.
Co-Lead Counsel, In re Pradaxa (Dabigatran Etexilate) Products Liability Litigation, MDL 2385 (S.D. Ill.) – $650 million settlement involving approximately 4,000 claims.
Liaison Counsel, In re Ortho Evra Products Liability Litigation, MDL 1742 (N.D. Ohio) – Approximately 3,000 confidential settlements.
Chairperson, Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee, In re Testosterone Replacement Therapy Products Liability Litigation, MDL 2545 (N.D. Ill.) – All defendants resolved approximately 7,000 claims.
Co-Liaison Counsel, In re Levaquin Litigation (N.J. Superior Court) – Hundreds of confidential settlements.
Co-Lead Counsel, In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company C-8 Personal Injury Litigation, MDL 2433 (S.D. Ohio) – $671 million settlement of approximately 3,600 claims.
Co-Lead Counsel, In re Invokana (Canagliflozin) Products Liability Litigation, MDL 2750 (D.N.J.) – Approximately 2,000 confidential settlements pending resolution.
Across the eight national litigations where he served as co-lead or liaison counsel, each resolved efficiently through settlements, typically between 18 and 47 months from MDL centralization to settlement announcement. Mr. London served as the primary negotiator in six of these matters, securing more than $18 billion in settlements since 2005.
Co-Lead Counsel, Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee, In re Aqueous Film-Forming Foam Products Liability Litigation, MDL 2873 (D.S.C).
Chair, Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee, In re Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation, MDL 2846 (S.D. Ohio).
Mr. London has served on discovery, expert, law and briefing, and class action committees in several complex cases. He has represented hundreds of women exposed to Diethylstibestrol (DES), victims of the September 11th World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation, individuals harmed in the Ambulatory Pain Pump-Chondrolysis litigation, families impacted by the CVS device, and others.
He has also served as trial counsel in multiple tobacco cases, including securing the first successful verdict against the tobacco industry in New York State. He was co-trial counsel in the first Norplant products liability trial in New York and has supported numerous trial teams with jury selection and courtroom strategy.
Mr. London serves on the Board of Directors and Executive Committee of the New York State Trial Lawyers Association (NYSTLA), the Board of Governors of the American Association for Justice (AAJ), and is a member of Public Justice and the Tobacco Trial Lawyers Association. He sits on the President’s Advisory Council at Brooklyn Law School.
He is a frequent lecturer on mass torts, preemption, medical malpractice, and jury selection, and has been featured on major media outlets including CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, The New York Times, New York Magazine, and Forbes. His published work includes articles on vaccines, the Learned Intermediary Doctrine, youth smoking, mercury exposure, and products liability issues.
Mr. London is the attorney in charge of Douglas & London’s New Jersey practice and also serves as the firm’s general counsel.

James E. Cecchi founded and directs Carella Byrne's class action practice, a leading consumer class action firm in the State of New Jersey and across the United States. Mr. Cecchi has held leadership positions in many of the nation’s most complex and significant consumer class actions affecting consumer rights over the last decade, and under his leadership the firm has returned billions of dollars to consumers.
Prior to joining the firm in 1994, Mr. Cecchi served in the United States Department of Justice as an Assistant United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey, where he participated in major criminal prosecutions involving money laundering, narcotics smuggling, and violations of federal firearms laws. From 1989 to 1991, Mr. Cecchi served as a law clerk to the Honorable Nicholas H. Politan, United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey (Ret.).
Mr. Cecchi was appointed to the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee in In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL No. 2804, in the Northern District of Ohio. In that role, he served as the sole negotiator between the State of New Jersey and its subdivisions regarding allocation of settlement funds from the nation’s largest drug distributors and Janssen Pharmaceutical, ultimately securing a fifty percent allocation, exceeding three hundred million dollars, to the subdivisions.
Mr. Cecchi served on the Steering Committee and as Settlement Class Counsel in In re Volkswagen “Clean Diesel” Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2672, in the Northern District of California. The matter resulted in a settlement exceeding fifteen billion dollars for consumer fraud and warranty claims arising from the use of defeat devices to evade United States emissions regulations.
He was also appointed to the Steering Committee and as Settlement Class Counsel in In re Takata Airbag Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2599, in the Southern District of Florida, which resulted in settlements exceeding one and a half billion dollars for consumer fraud and warranty claims involving defective airbags. The litigation remains ongoing as to certain second-wave defendants.
In In re American Medical Collection Agency, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL No. 2904, in the District of New Jersey, Mr. Cecchi was appointed sole Lead Counsel in the national multidistrict data breach litigation.
Mr. Cecchi was appointed Interim Co-Lead Counsel in In re Mercedes-Benz Emissions Litigation in the District of New Jersey, a case arising from the alleged use of defeat devices to evade United States emissions regulations, which resolved with final approval of a settlement valued in excess of seven hundred million dollars.
Mr. Cecchi also served in leadership roles in consumer, antitrust, and securities fraud litigations involving pharmaceutical products, including Vytorin and Zetia, where consumer cases settled for over forty-one million dollars and related securities cases settled for hundreds of millions of dollars.
As Lead Counsel in In re Liquid Aluminum Sulfate Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2687, in the District of New Jersey, Mr. Cecchi secured a settlement exceeding one hundred million dollars. He also served as Chair of the Plaintiffs’ Indirect Purchaser Executive Committee in In re Effexor XR Antitrust Litigation.
Mr. Cecchi acted as Co-Lead Counsel in Davis Landscape v. Hertz Equipment Rental, securing a nationwide class settlement valued at more than fifty million dollars, and served in leadership roles in major securities, derivative, and ERISA litigations, including claims arising from Merck’s Vioxx litigation, which settled for more than one billion dollars.
Mr. Cecchi also served as Co-Lead Counsel in In re Mercedes-Benz Tele-Aid Contract Litigation, resulting in a forty million dollar settlement of consumer fraud claims arising from Mercedes-Benz’s failure to notify customers of mandated technology changes.

Lee Popkin is a trial lawyer in the Litigation Department, co-head of the Mass Torts & Product Liability group, and a member of the Trial Strategies practice. Recognized as “an emerging go-to talent,” by Chambers USA, Lee has significant experience trying high-stakes cases in state and federal courts throughout the country. Her diverse practice spans complex commercial, product liability, and antitrust litigation and includes clients in the pharmaceutical, agricultural, consumer product, sports, and financial services industries.
Lee’s clients rely on her to handle all phases of litigation—from pre-litigation risk assessments through trial and resolution. They value her talent for simplifying complex issues, building credibility with judges and juries, and delivering thoughtful, strategic solutions.
Lee was named Young Lawyer of the Year (Litigation) by The American Lawyer for 2022 and shortlisted for Product Liability Lawyer of the Year in Euromoney’s Women in Business Law awards in 2023 and 2024. Lee is ranked by Chambers USA for Commercial Litigation and recognized by The Legal 500 for her work in Product Liability and Mass Torts. Benchmark Litigation named Lee among its “Litigation Stars” and included her in its '40 and Under' list.
Lee also devotes significant time to pro bono matters, and was recognized by KIND for her work representing two sisters from El Salvador fleeing gang violence. Before joining Proskauer, Lee served as law clerk to the Honorable Sarah S. Vance of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. She received her J.D. cum laude from Harvard Law School.

Tom Pirtle is a nationally acclaimed trial lawyer renowned for his groundbreaking achievements in personal injury, wrongful death, defective product, and commercial dispute cases. With an exceptional track record in the courtroom, Tom has secured numerous landmark verdicts. Additionally, he has displayed his commitment to representing the rights of injured individuals through leadership positions in significant multi-district litigations, including:
Tom graduated with honors, receiving a Bachelor of Science degree from Stephen F. Austin University in 1987, where he was awarded Most Outstanding Graduate by the Board of Regents. He went on to graduate from South Texas College of Law in 1990.

The chair of Lieff Cabraser’s Economic Injury Product Defect Practice Group, partner Jason L. Lichtman has extensive experience leading multidistrict and large class action litigation on behalf of consumer plaintiffs. With a practice focused on consumer protection, data privacy, and damages, Jason recently recovered more than $122 million in economic value for coffee farmers in the Kona region who sued nearly two dozen companies for selling “Kona coffee” that was not coffee from Kona. The Court described Jason as conducting one “of the most impressive class action cases I have dealt with in my time on the federal bench,” adding that his results in the litigation were “great for justice” because this was a case with “a real result that makes people whole again.”
Numerous other courts have also appointed Jason to leadership positions in large consumer protection cases, in which he has recovered more than $500 million for his clients, including the exploding Samsung Top-Loading Washing Machines case (Co-Lead Counsel); the Whirlpool Corp. Front-Loading Washer products liability litigation (Co-Lead Counsel); and the Dover v. British Airways airline overcharging case (Class Counsel). In the Whirlpool Defective Washers Products Liability litigation, Jason served as Co-Chair of the Law and Motion Committee, one of the trial counsel, and Lead Settlement Counsel, achieving a nationwide settlement strongly favorable to plaintiffs following a bellwether trial, multiple appeals to the Sixth and Seventh Circuits (all won by plaintiffs), and multiple petitions for certiorari (all defeated by plaintiffs). Jason has also secured major victories as counsel of record before numerous federal appellate courts.
Jason’s practice also includes a focus on complex damages issues, including in the Anthem Data Breach Litigation and Marriott Data Breach litigation, leading plaintiffs’ work with damages experts, including the development of highly technical, comprehensive experts reports, defending depositions of plaintiffs’ experts, and taking defendants’ experts’ depositions. The Marriott case remains pending, but Jason’s work contributed heavily to the groundbreaking settlement for plaintiffs of $115 million in Anthem, as well as significant injunctive relief targeting deficient Anthem’s cybersecurity practices. Jason also serves on the board of directors for Public Justice Foundation and is past Chair of the Public Justice Class Action Committee. Public Justice is devoted to standing up for consumers against unscrupulous payday lenders, reckless polluters, dangerous food producers, and other bad corporate actors. A multiple-year “Super Lawyer” for the New York area, he also served on the Law360 Privacy and Consumer Protection Editorial Advisory Board, providing feedback on Law360’s news coverage, including case updates, policy developments, and trends in various industries.
A founding partner of Seeger Weiss, Christopher A. Seeger is widely recognized as a highly innovative and accomplished plaintiff attorney. Chiefly known for multidistrict mass torts and class actions involving drug injury, toxic injury, and personal injury, Chris’ versatile practice also includes product liability, property damage, antitrust, and third-party payer litigation, as well as consumer, insurance, and securities fraud. Chris has led some of the most complex, groundbreaking, and high-profile litigations in the U.S. at the state and federal levels. He has received more multidistrict litigation (MDL) appointments than any other lawyer between 2016 and 2019, according to a 2020 ALM study.
Chris served as co-lead counsel in the 3M Combat Arms Earplug Litigation, having been chosen by Judge M. Casey Rodgers from a pool of nearly 200 other applicants to represent more than 250,000 service members and veterans who suffered hearing injuries while using 3M earplugs. After more than four years of litigation, Chris secured a landmark settlement worth over $6 billion in August 2023, successfully resolving the largest mass tort in American history.
Appointed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti to lead the Philips Recalled CPAP, Bi-Level Pap, and Mechanical Ventilator Litigation, Chris represented patients impacted by the company’s recall of more than 10.8 million devices. He was the lead negotiator for an uncapped class action settlement worth a minimum of $479 million that was announced in September 2023, resolving economic loss claims of users and payers impacted by the recall. After receiving final approval for the economic loss settlement, Chris negotiated additional agreements in April 2024 to resolve plaintiffs' personal injury claims for $1.075 billion and medical monitoring claims for $25 million, providing compensation to patients who suffered significant physical injuries caused by the recalled machines.
In the National Prescription Opiate litigation, Chris was appointed to the Executive and Settlement Committees by Judge Dan A. Polster. In 2022, he played an instrumental role in securing settlements worth more than $15 billion with Walgreens, Walmart, CVS, and Kroger. Also, in 2022, a $6.6 billion settlement was reached with pharmaceutical manufacturers Teva and Allergan (AbbVie). Previously, in July 2021, the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee in the federal opioid litigation formally announced the terms for a $26 billion global settlement agreement with opioid manufacturer Johnson & Johnson and the “Big Three” drug distributors AmerisourceBergen, Cardinal Health, and McKesson. To date, Chris has been involved in over $50 billion in settlements through the National Prescription Opioid Litigation.
Chris serves as co-lead counsel in the Proton-Pump Inhibitor Litigation on behalf of patients who suffered kidney injuries while using proton-pump inhibitor drugs. On October 3, 2023, he announced a $425 million settlement with AstraZeneca and additional agreements with GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, and Takeda, bringing the total value of the resolution to $590.4 million.
Chris’s unprecedented run of recent settlements adds to his impressive legacy of resolving major cases and obtaining billions in compensation for injured plaintiffs. This includes a $4.85 billion landmark global settlement with Merck on behalf of patients who suffered heart attacks and strokes while taking Vioxx, a $21 billion-plus settlement with Volkswagen and Audi over the “clean diesel” scandal—the largest consumer auto industry class action settlement in U.S. history, a $1.5 billion settlement for farmers impacted by Syngenta GMO seed contamination—the largest agricultural settlement in U.S. history, and a $1 billion-plus uncapped settlement for retired NFL players and their families in the historic NFL concussion case.
After starting his career as a corporate defense lawyer representing the interests of big business, Chris was struck by the imbalance of power between corporations and the individuals harmed by them. As a result, he left to become a plaintiff attorney. The son of a union carpenter who worked his way through school, Chris is a former amateur boxer and a current Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu black belt. Now, whether working on a class action involving thousands of people against a multinational conglomerate or an individual case protecting one client’s rights, he fights with the same passion and conviction.
Chris has been recognized for his outstanding work and unmatched success in leading complex federal cases. He has received the National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers Lifetime Achievement Award, been named a Lawdragon Legend, a Law360 Titan of the Plaintiff Bar, and been inducted into both the Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame and the Legal 500 Hall of Fame. He is consistently named to annual award lists, including Chambers USA Tier 1 for Product Liability, Lawdragon 500 Leading Lawyers in America, and Best Lawyers in America. Regularly quoted by the press regarding his work on nationally and internationally prominent cases, Chris has appeared in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, Associated Press, Bloomberg, Reuters, ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, and ESPN.
Jim's practice focuses on the defense of pharmaceutical, medical device and consumer product litigation in state and federal courts nationwide, particularly consolidated mass torts and multi-district litigations.
In Chambers, clients describe Jim as having "[a]n incredible ability to synthesize complex scientific issues into very persuasive arguments that can be used both in court and in negotiations with the other side."
He serves as national coordinating counsel and MDL counsel for consolidated litigations across the U.S. involving thousands of plaintiffs as well as in numerous single-plaintiff cases involving pharmaceuticals, consumer products and medical devices. In conjunction with those roles, Jim emphasizes efficient discovery and manages significant mass tort e-discovery undertakings for his clients.
Jim has also coordinated the resolution of some of the largest, mass torts of the last decade.
Jim also counsels clients on product liability due diligence related to potential acquisitions and divestitures.
Regarding pharmaceutical and biologic manufacturers, Jim's experience includes:
Regarding medical device and consumer products manufacturers, Jim's experience includes:

Douglas C. Monsour, or Doug Monsour, is a trial lawyer who handles important and significant injury cases in Texas and across the nation. He is one of a handful of trial lawyers who have successfully tried multiple pharmaceutical, medical device, and mass tort product liability cases as the lead lawyer. He also vigorously represents injured oil field workers, victims of 18-wheeler wrecks, industrial accident victims, and those that have been severely burned.
Trial Success
Doug is known for his abilities in the courtroom. Recently, Doug secured two major trial victories in the 3M Combat Arms version 2 earplug litigation. On December 10, 2021, a Tallahassee, Florida Federal Court jury awarded U.S. Army veteran T.J. Finley $22.5 million for hearing loss suffered due to his defective Combat Arms version 2 earplugs. A few months later, on April 29, 2022, a Federal Court jury in Gainesville, Florida awarded $2.2 million to U.S. Army veteran Jonathan Vaughn for his hearing loss suffered from wearing the defective Combat Arms version 2 earplugs. The Finley v. 3M verdict was listed by The National Law Journal as one of the Top 100 verdicts of 2021. In fact, this verdict was the very first verdict in the entire 3M litigation to ever make the Top 100 list. Both trials were defended by international law firm Kirkland & Ellis.
Previously, in November 2014, Doug served as the lead lawyer in a transvaginal mesh case involving four women implanted with the Obtryx sling system to treat stress urinary incontinence. After an almost month-long trial, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs in the amount of $18.5 million. This was the first verdict against Boston Scientific in the Federal Multi-District Litigation (MDL) for any of its incontinence sling products.(Wilson et al v. Boston Scientific Corp., WV, MDL 2326).
In 2004, Doug’s trial skills were tested by pharmaceutical giant Wyeth. He served as lead lawyer in two very significant Fen-Phen cases. In the first case, Wyeth hired world famous defense lawyer Dan Webb of Chicago’s legal Goliath, Winston & Strawn, to defend them. In the third week of the trial, Wyeth relented and settled for a confidential sum. In the second case, Wyeth retained Houston mega-firm Vinson & Elkins to defend them. Wyeth again relented, and just before closing arguments settled for a confidential sum.
In addition to these trials, Doug has tried over thirty cases of various types including oil field injuries, defective drugs, defective medical devices, medical malpractice, trucking (18-wheeler) wrecks, industrial accidents, car wrecks, civil rights and malicious prosecution.
Doug is triple board certified. He is Board Certified in Personal Injury Trail Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. In addition, he is a Board Certified as a Civil Trial Advocate by the National Board of Trial Advocacy. Furthermore, he is Board Certified in Civil Pretrial Practice Advocacy by the National Board of Civil Pretrial Practice Advocacy.

Judge Salas earned her B.A. from Rutgers University and her J.D. from Rutgers School of Law–Newark. After graduating from law school, Judge Salas clerked for the Honorable Eugene J. Codey, Judge of the Superior Court, Essex County Vicinage. In October 1995, Judge Salas entered private practice with the law firm of Garces and Grabler, P.C., where she focused on criminal defense and appellate litigation. In September 1997, Judge Salas joined the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the District of New Jersey. As an Assistant Federal Public Defender, she represented indigent criminal clients before both the New Jersey District Court and the Third Circuit.
On November 3, 2006, Judge Salas was sworn in as a Magistrate Judge for the District of New Jersey—the first attorney of Hispanic descent to hold that position. On June 14, 2011, the Senate unanimously confirmed President Obama’s nomination of Judge Salas as a United States District Judge. She was sworn in by the Honorable Jose L. Linares, becoming the first Latina District Judge in the District of New Jersey.
As a District Judge, Judge Salas has presided over complex civil and criminal matters, including numerous issues of first impression for the District of New Jersey. Along with Senior District Judge Katharine S. Hayden, she co-founded the District of New Jersey Pretrial Opportunity Program, which provides pre-trial judicial intervention for criminal defendants struggling with drug and alcohol addiction.
Judge Salas has received significant recognition for her work on and off the bench. Her honors include the Whipple Memorial Award from the Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey (2008), the Women’s Initiative and Leaders in Law Platinum Award from the New Jersey Women Lawyers Association (2015), the Woman of Substance Award from Seton Hall University’s Women’s Law Forum (2015), the Public Interest Law Foundation Award from Rutgers University (2021), the President’s Award from the Hispanic National Bar Association (2022), the Justice Thurgood Marshall Award from the New Jersey State Bar Association (2022), the Jurist Award for Making the World a More Just Place from the National Judicial College (2023), the William J. Brennan, Jr. Award from the Association of the Federal Bar of New Jersey (2023), the Excellence in Civic Engagement Award from the William J. Hughes Center for Public Policy at Stockton University (2023), the Raphael Lemkin Rule of Law Guardian Award from the Bloch Judicial Institute of Duke Law School (2024), and the Morton A. Brody Distinguished Judicial Service Award from Colby College (2024).
Judge Salas is a loving wife to her husband of 26 years, Mark Anderl, and the proud mother of her late son, Daniel Mark Anderl, who gave his life protecting his family when a disgruntled lawyer targeted Judge Salas because of her role as a federal judge. Following Daniel’s tragic murder, Judge Salas has made it her mission to secure greater protections for members of the judiciary. Her advocacy led to the passage of “Daniel’s Law” in New Jersey, and she worked tirelessly for similar federal protections. As a result, President Biden signed the Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Privacy Act into law on December 23, 2022.

Wesley L. Hsu is a judge on the United States District Court for the Central District of California. He was nominated to the court by President Joe Biden (D) on January 23, 2023, and confirmed by the United States Senate on May 3, 2023, by a vote of 53 – 43.
The United States District Court for the Central District of California is one of 94 U.S. District Courts. They are the general trial courts of the United States federal courts.
Prior to joining the court, Hsu was a judge on the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California.
United States United States District Court for the Central District of California (2023-present)
On January 23, 2023, President Joe Biden (D) nominated Hsu to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. He was confirmed by a 53 - 43 vote of the U.S. Senate on May 3, 2023. Hsu received commission on May 12, 2023.

Jayne Conroy is a named partner at Simmons Hanly Conroy and oversees practice areas in the Complex Litigation Department. Under her leadership, the firm has become one of the country’s largest plaintiff law firms dedicated to helping those injured by corporate wrongdoing.
With a legal career spanning more than three decades, Jayne has earned a superb national reputation as an elite trial lawyer, skilled strategist and decisive negotiator. She has consistently helped secure billions of dollars in verdicts and settlements for thousands of individuals, families and communities in numerous courtrooms nationwide.
“We are a threat to defendants because we are everywhere,” Jayne said while talking about the depth of experience in her department. “They know they have to deal with us, and we are prepared to try cases.”
Jayne focuses her practice on helping plaintiffs exclusively in mass torts, class actions, product liability, pharmaceutical and sexual abuse litigation. She serves or has served on dozens of court-appointed leadership committees in complex legal actions of national scope. These complex mass tort cases, called multidistrict litigations or MDLs, involve thousands of cases originating from state courts around the country and consolidated before a single federal judge.
Jayne is a co-lead in the National Prescription Opiate MDL and the East Palestine train derailment matter against Norfolk Southern. Jayne's most recent MDL appointment includes the Plaintiff’s Executive Committee in the In re: Camp Lejeune Water Litigation in the North Carolina Southern Division which alleges drinking may have been contaminated with toxic chemicals that can cause multiple types of cancer, birth defects, Parkinson’s disease and more. She is also on the Plaintiff’s Executive Committee in the MDL In re Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation and the Plaintiff’s Steering Committee for the MDL In re McKinsey & Company Inc National Prescription Opiate Consultant Litigation, Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, which alleges McKinsey knowingly engineered marketing tactics that caused an avalanche of opioid addiction.

The Honorable Kelley Brisbon Hodge is a United States District Court Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Judge Hodge was nominated by President Joseph R. Biden on July 12, 2022, and received her commission from the President on December 23, 2022. She was sworn in as District Judge by Chief Judge Juan R. Sánchez on December 28, 2022.
Prior to joining the federal bench, Judge Hodge was a partner in private practice in the Labor and Employment section of Fox Rothschild LLP in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Before joining Fox Rothschild LLP, Judge Hodge served as the 25th District Attorney of Philadelphia after being elected in 2017 by the Board of Judges for the Court of Common Pleas for the First Judicial District. Upon her election, Judge Hodge became the first African American woman to lead the District Attorney's Office in its 167-year history and the first African American woman to lead a District Attorney's Office in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
As an attorney, Judge Hodge practiced law in Pennsylvania and Virginia, beginning her legal career as a public defender in Richmond, Virginia, in 1997. She later relocated to Philadelphia, where she joined the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office in 2004. Before becoming District Attorney, Judge Hodge served as the first independent Title IX coordinator at the University of Virginia. Over her career, she was also appointed by two Pennsylvania Governors to statewide commissions focused on school safety, juvenile justice, and citizen review of law enforcement.
Across more than twenty-five years as an attorney, Judge Hodge developed extensive experience in trial practice, litigation, and compliance, focusing on education law, criminal law, government policy advising, discrimination, and civil rights.
Judge Hodge earned her Bachelor of Arts from the University of Virginia in 1993 and her Juris Doctor from the University of Richmond School of Law in 1996. She has served as a lecturer in law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and the University of Virginia School of Law. She has served on numerous boards, has been recognized by various legal and professional organizations, and is active in several community-centered organizations.

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Nominated by George W. Bush on July 14, 2003, to a seat vacated by Lacey A. Collier. Confirmed by the Senate on October 20, 2003, and received commission on November 21, 2003. Served as chief judge, 2011-2018.
Other Federal Judicial Service:
U.S. Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, 2002-2003
Education:
University of West Florida, B.A., 1989
California Western School of Law, J.D., 1992
Professional Career:
U.S. Army, 1985-1987
Law clerk, Hon. Lacey A. Collier, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida, 1992-1994
Private practice, Pensacola, Florida, 1994-1998, 1999-2002
General counsel, West Florida Medical Center, Pensacola, Florida, 1998-1999
Judge Perez earned her bachelor’s degree from Tufts University in Medford, Massachusetts before enrolling at Temple University’s Beasley School of Law. Upon graduating, Judge Perez accepted a position at the Defender Association of Philadelphia where she honed her skills as a trial attorney, dedicating thousands of hours to her cases, culminating with the representation of indigent defendants in the Court of Common Pleas, Major Trial Division.
Ready for a different challenge, Judge Perez was then tapped to serve as an associate at Friedman Schuman Applebaum, PC where she represented municipalities in counties throughout Southeast Pennsylvania and members of Laborers Union Local 135.
In 2011, Judge Perez established her own practice, Perez Law LLC, specializing in criminal defense and family law. The practice argued cases in federal court, in addition to counties throughout Pennsylvania, while maintaining an office in Philadelphia. Judge Perez handled various types of complex cases including sex trafficking and capital homicide.
Judge Perez has demonstrated her passion for teaching young lawyers by serving as an adjunct professor at the Temple University’s James E. Beasley School of Law, teaching second- and third-year law students for ten years and coaching the school’s distinguished Trial Advocacy Program. She also serves as an instructor for Trial Advocacy Consulting and Training, LLC
In 2016, Judge Perez became one of the youngest judges to serve on the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas bench. She presided over thousands of cases in the Criminal Division. In July 2021, Judge Perez was one of five Criminal Division judges tapped to participate in the Case Accelerated Resolution Program (CARP), designed to bring expedited resolutions to the many cases pending as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and cleared hundreds of cases since the initiation of that program. Judge Perez also served as the Supervising Judge of the city’s Investigating Grand Jury Program, as a co-chair of the First Judicial District’s Education Committee, on the First Judicial District Jury Committee, and as a member of: the First Judicial District Language Focus Group, the First Judicial District Criminal Division Pandemic Working Group, the Philadelphia Bar Association “Bench Bar” committee, the State Council for Interstate Adult Offender Supervision, and the Pennsylvania Bar Association House of Delegates. Judge Perez was appointed to serve on the Judicial Conduct Board of Pennsylvania by Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf in January of 2022.
President Joe Biden nominated Judge Perez to serve as a United States district Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on July 12, 2022. The United States Senate confirmed Judge Perez’s nomination on December 7, 2022, and she received her judicial commission on December 16, 2022.

District Judge Linda Lopez was nominated in September 2021 to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California and confirmed by the U.S. Senate in December 2021. Prior to her confirmation, she served in the same district as a magistrate judge since her appointment in 2018. Previously, she was a senior trial attorney for the Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., from 2007 until her appointment to the bench. From 2003 to 2007, she was a sole practitioner, running a criminal defense firm and practicing in both state and federal court in Miami, where she defended both retained defendants and financially eligible defendants appointed to her as part of the Criminal Justice Act Panel. From 1999 to 2003, she was an attorney with a small firm in Miami where she had worked for nine years in various legal assistant positions while going to college and law school.
Judge Lopez received her Bachelor of Arts, magna cum laude, from Florida International University in 1996 and her Juris Doctor, magna cum laude and Order of the Coif, in 1999 from the University of Miami School of Law, where she served as an editor for the University of Miami Law Review.
In 2018, Judge Lopez was recognized with a Service Award for her dedicated leadership as head of the San Diego Chapter of the Federal Bar Association’s Community Outreach Committee from 2018 to 2019. In addition to her work with the Community Outreach Committee, Judge Lopez has volunteered extensively with the San Diego Chapter of the FBA throughout her career, including as a board member, and as a liaison for the Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc. Judge Lopez is currently a Master of the Welsh Inn of Court, and was previously a Master of the Enright Inn of Court. She has served on the Board of Governors of the San Diego Chapter of the Association of Business Trial Lawyers since 2018, a Ninth Circuit Director at Large to the Federal Judicial Association since 2024, and a member of the Judging Committee for the Ninth Circuit Civics Essay Contest. Finally, Judge Lopez is on the FBA’s Judicial Advisory Board.

Sean P. Fahey is a partner and chair of Troutman Pepper Locke’s Health Sciences Department where he leads the group’s litigation, white collar, regulatory, intellectual property, and transactional practices. He has extensive experience serving as national coordinating and trial counsel in complex, multidistrict products liability and health care litigation. He represents several of the largest pharmaceutical, medical device, and life science companies in their high-stakes cases, and also serves as strategic settlement counsel and coordinating counsel in parallel litigation, including DOJ and regulatory investigations, and congressional hearings. He is nationally recognized by clients and peers in Chambers USA, Benchmark Litigation, The Legal 500, LMG Life Sciences, and The Best Lawyers in America.
.jpg)
Hon. Rukhsanah L. Singh is a United States Magistrate Judge in the Trenton Vicinage of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. She is an Adjunct Professor at Seton Hall University School of Law and routinely speaks on topics involving a broad range of discovery issues, such as electronic discovery, as well as pretrial practices, particularly in complex and multidistrict litigation. Prior to her appointment to the bench, Judge Singh was an Assistant General Counsel for Litigation at BASF Corporation and previously served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York. Judge Singh also practiced at a midsize firm in New Jersey and served as a law clerk to the Honorable Joel A. Pisano, U.S.D.J., in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, as well as to the Honorable Roberto A. Rivera-Soto, Associate Justice in the New Jersey Supreme Court. Judge Singh received her B.A. from Davidson College and her J.D. from Seton Hall University School of Law.

Stuart Davidson is a partner in Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP’s Boca Raton office. His practice focuses on complex consumer class actions, including cases involving deceptive and unfair trade practices, privacy and data breach issues, and antitrust violations.
He has served as class counsel in some of the nation’s most significant privacy and consumer cases, including: In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation, No. 3:15-cv-03747-JD (N.D. Cal.) ($650 million recovery in a cutting-edge class action concerning Facebook’s alleged privacy violations through its collection of user’s biometric identifiers without informed consent); In re Yahoo! Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, No. 5:16-md-02752-LHK (N.D. Cal.) ($117.5 million recovery in the largest data breach in history); Kehoe v. Fidelity Federal Bank & Trust, No. 9:03-cv-80593-DTKH (S.D. Fla.) ($50 million recovery in Driver’s Privacy Protection Act case on behalf of half-a-million Florida drivers against a national bank); In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, No. 3:11-md-02258-AJB-MDD (S.D. Cal.) (settlement valued at $15 million concerning the massive data breach of Sony’s PlayStation Network); and In re Solara Medical Supplies Data Breach Litigation, No. 3:19-cv-02284-H-KSC (S.D. Cal.) ($5 million all-cash settlement for victims of healthcare data breach).
Stuart currently serves as Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel in In re American Medical Collection Agency, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, No. 2:19-md-02904-MCA-MAH (D.N.J.) (representing class of LabCorp customers), In re Independent Living Systems Data Breach Litigation, No. 1:23-cv-21060-KMW (S.D. Fla.), Garner v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00750-RSL (W.D. Wash.) (alleging Amazon’s illegal wiretapping through Alexa-enabled devices), In re American Financial Resources, Inc. Data Breach Litigation, No. 2:22-cv-01757-MCA-JSA (D.N.J.), In re Fortra Tile Transfer Software Data Security Breach Litigation, No. 1:24-md-03090-RAR (S.D. Fla.) (representing Aetna patients), on Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee in In re Lakeview Loan Servicing Data Breach Litigation, No. 1:22-cv-20955-DPG (S.D. Fla.), and on Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in In re FTX Cryptocurrency Exchange Collapse Litigation, No. 1:23-md-03076-KMM (S.D. Fla.). Stuart also currently represents the State of Arkansas in a major antitrust enforcement action, State of Arkansas ex rel. Griffin v. Syngenta Crop Protection AG, No. 4:22-cv-01287-BSM (E.D. Ark.).
Stuart also spearheaded several aspects of In re EpiPen (Epinephrine Injection, USP) Marketing, Sales Practices & Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:17-md-02785-DDC-TJJ (D. Kan.) ($609 million total recovery achieved weeks prior to trial in certified class action alleging antitrust claims involving the illegal reverse payment settlement to delay the generic EpiPen, which allowed the prices of the life-saving EpiPen to rise over 600% in 9 years), served as Co-Lead Class Counsel in three cases brought against Genworth Life Insurance Company on behalf of long-term care insureds, Skochin v. Genworth Life. Ins. Co., No. 3:19-cv-00049-REP (E.D. Va.); Halcom v. Genworth Life Ins. Co., No. 3:21-cv-00019-REP (E.D. Va.); and Haney v. Genworth Life Ins. Co., No. 3:22-cv-00055-REP (E.D. Va.), recovering hundreds of millions of dollars in cash damages for policyholders, and served as Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel in In re NHL Players’ Concussion Injury Litigation, No. 0:14-md-02551-SRN-BRT (D. Minn.) (representing retired National Hockey League players in multidistrict litigation suit against the NHL regarding injuries suffered due to repetitive head trauma and concussions), and in In re Pet Food Products Liability Litigation, No. 1:07-cv-02867-NLH-AMD (D.N.J.) ($24 million recovery in multidistrict consumer class action on behalf of thousands of aggrieved pet owners nationwide against some of the nation’s largest pet food manufacturers, distributors, and retailers). He also served as Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel in In re UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, C.A. No. 1012-VCS (Del. Ch.) ($25 million recovery weeks before trial); In re Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, No. 16-2011-CA-010616 (Fla. Cir. Ct.) ($11.5 million recovery for former Winn-Dixie shareholders following the corporate buyout by BI-LO); and In re AuthenTec, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, No. 5-2012-CA-57589 (Fla. Cir. Ct.) ($10 million recovery for former AuthenTec shareholders following a merger with Apple). The latter two cases are the two largest merger and acquisition recoveries in Florida history.
Stuart is a former lead assistant public defender in the Felony Division of the Broward County, Florida Public Defender’s Office. During his tenure at the Public Defender’s Office, he tried over 30 jury trials and defended individuals charged with major crimes ranging from third-degree felonies to life and capital felonies. He has been quoted in numerous major media outlets regarding his cases, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Today, U.S. News & World Report, New York Daily News, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, the Boston Globe, the Miami Herald, The Globe & Mail, and Law360, and is a frequent speaker at conferences involving class action practice and procedure.
Stuart has been honored in the category of Outstanding Antitrust Litigation Achievement in Private Practice at the American Antitrust Institute’s Antitrust Enforcement Awards. He has also been named a Litigation Star by Benchmark Litigation, a Recommended Lawyer by The Legal 500, a Leading Lawyer in America, a Leading Litigator in America, a Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyer, and a Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyer by Lawdragon, one of “Florida’s Most Effective Lawyers” by American Law Media’s Daily Business Review, and a member of The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100-Civil Plaintiffs. He has also been named a Super Lawyer by Super Lawyers Magazine. He is a member of the Sedona Conference Working Group 11 Brainstorming Group, focusing on the California Consumer Protection Act. Stuart currently serves on the 2024 Consumer Protection Editorial Advisory Board for Law360.
Stuart earned his Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from the State University of New York at Geneseo. Stuart earned a Juris Doctor degree from the Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad College of Law, where he graduated summa cum laude in the top 3% of his class. While in law school he was the Associate Editor for the Nova Law Review and was the recipient of Book Awards (highest grade) in Trial Advocacy, International Law, and Criminal Pretrial Practice.

Robert Shelby has been a District Judge in the District of Utah since 2012, and Chief Judge since 2018. He serves by appointment on the Committee on Defender Services for the Judicial Conference of the United States. He served on the Tenth Circuit Judicial Council from 2021-2023.
Judge Shelby obtained degrees from Utah State University and the University of Virginia School of Law. He clerked for United States District Judge J. Thomas Greene in the District of Utah, and later enjoyed a diverse private practice with an emphasis in complex commercial litigation.
He is a former President of the Salt Lake County Bar Association and the David K. Watkiss – Sutherland Inn of Court and is a Fellow of the American Bar Foundation. Judge Shelby served on active duty with the Utah Army National Guard during Operation Desert Storm before receiving an Honorable Discharge in 1994.

Judge Rita F. Lin is a U.S. District Judge in the Northern District of California. Prior to her appointment to the federal bench, she served as a Superior Court Judge in San Francisco for five years. She presided over felony trials involving crimes ranging from murder to rape to child sexual abuse, as well as a variety of criminal calendars, including mental health court and preliminary hearings. Before becoming a judge, Judge Lin was an Assistant United States Attorney in the Northern District of California in the Criminal Division. She investigated and prosecuted public corruption, illegal opioid prescriptions, organized crime, money laundering, and narcotics trafficking, among other crimes. Before that, she was a litigation partner at Morrison and Foerster, where she practiced complex commercial litigation principally involving class actions and intellectual property, and maintained an active pro bono caseload. In 2012, the Daily Journal named her one of the Top 100 Women Lawyers in California, and in 2017, the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association named her one of the Best Lawyers Under 40. Judge Lin is the first Chinese American woman to become a District Judge in the Northern District. She began her career as a law clerk for Judge Sandra Lynch on the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Judge Lin is a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School
.jpg)
Larry Taylor is an attorney with The Cochran Firm – Dallas. His practice focuses on serious personal injury litigation concentrating in the areas of wrongful death, automobile accidents, truck accidents, as well as criminal defense cases. Larry earned his Bachelor’s Degree from Texas A&M University. He obtained his Juris Doctor from Thurgood Marshall School of Law at Texas Southern University where he served as a member of the Board of Regents. Prior to attending law school, Larry worked as an investment banker and financial strategist for small business owners.
